Abion / Blog / The Gummy Bear Saga: A Sweet Win for 3D Figurative Marks
Gummy bears case

The Fourth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) rules on distinctiveness of Gummy Bears.

On 11 October 2023, the Fourth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO), in case R 872/2023-4, recognised the distinctiveness of a figurative mark representing a gummy bear.

Abion's Lead Associate, Federica Forchino, discusses how this decision serves as a useful reminder that, just because an image can be used decoratively, that does not mean that it is not capable of being relied upon by the public to determine the trade source of goods, and therefore, may be registrable as trademarks.

Case Background

This story starts with Rigo Trading S.A. (Rigo), the Luxemburg HARIBO group’s holding company and IP custodian of their sugary empire. In a move back in 2021, Rigo, filed an application for an International Registration (IR) under the Madrid Protocol for the 3D figurative mark representing the Gummy Bear, for a wide range of goods and services, including classes 9, 14, 16, 28, 20, 21, 24, 25, 26, 27 and 28.

But here's where it gets interesting. In June 2022, the examiner assigned to the application's designation for the EU (the Examiner) issued a provisional partial refusal. The reason? The Examiner found that the mark lacked the distinctive character needed for protection, pursuant to Article 7(1)(b) of the EU Trademark Regulation 2017/0001 (EUTMR). This refusal encompassed a substantial part of the goods applied for in the above classes (including computer cases, gemstones, printed matter, bags, household linen, clothing, carpets and toys).

The grounds for the refusal were rooted in the belief that they did not consider the mark to have distinctive character for such goods (i.e. it could not be relied on by the public to determine the trade source) for the following reasons:

  • The Gummy Bear image didn't significantly deviate from industry norms, and consumers typically paid more attention to product labels rather than the shapes or packaging.
  • The true to life portrayal of a gummy bear or its figurative representation is commonly used for decorative, artistic or aesthetic purposes.

In essence, the Gummy Bear mark was seen as a mere variation of common decorative elements found in other different products. The Examiner illustrated its reasoning using graphic examples found online, in particular, for class 9 (a phone case), 14 (jewellery including a bear pendant) and 25 (inflatable party costumes). This presented Rigo with a not that sweet challenge.

Despite Rigo's attempts to overturn the refusal, when it came to EUIPO reiterating its partial refusal of the Application with the decision issued in April 2023, Rigo wasn't ready to throw in the candy and with the same determination of a child opening a gummy bear packet, filed an appeal against the same.

The appeal, underlined several key points, including:

  • the mark was purely figurative, and purely figurative marks usually aren't dismissed as non-distinctive, except in those rare cases involving simple geometrical shapes or commonly used symbols.
  • the mark sported distinct elements illustrating a more stylised and abstract version of a bear. This sets it apart from other gummy bear-shaped sweets competitors produce and the examples provided by the Examiner did not refer to the legacy of the HARIBO Goldbear invented in 1978.
  • the mark harmonised with precedents related to other European Union Trademarks (EUTMs) that featured stylized animals or geometric shapes, including well-known brands like the Lacoste – crocodile.

The Board's Decision

And then the Board’s decision came like a candy treat at the end of the week....and it was a sweet one with a prompt reversal of the examiner’s decision.

The Board emphasised the essence of 'distinctive character,' defined under Article 7(1)(b) of the EUTMR, as the mark's capacity to identify the origin of goods and services while setting them apart, echoing precedent cases like Vorsprung durch Technik (C-398/08).

Statue of justice

In their assessment of “distinctive character”, they considered both the nature of the goods and services and the perspective of the average consumer with moderate attention. The purely figurative nature of the mark required a broader evaluation encompassing the entire EU territory (as per Glaverbel, T-141/06).

While establishing distinctiveness for three-dimensional marks is often challenging, the Board's twist was favourable. They found that the other goods used as an example in the Examiner’s reasoning came in various shapes, and the Gummy Bear motif wasn't automatically associated with these unrelated products. The small size and gum/gelatine composition of Gummy Bears also distinguished them from the different items.

Therefore, the Gummy Bear decorative use didn't diminish the mark's potential as a source identifier, supported by the General Court in Cross on the side of a Sports Shoe (T-117/21).

In the end, as the mark didn't resemble the expected shape of the goods in question and Gummy Bear representations were uncommon on such items, it was deemed to possess the minimum distinctive character necessary for EUTM protection. The appeal prevailed, aligning with the principle that marks can serve both decorative and source-identifying.

Conclusion

This decision could have a significant impact on the protection of 2D and 3D marks in the European Union as it emphasises that a minimum degree of distinctiveness is required for the protection of figurative trademarks, without any requirement of originality or artistic merit. Application for such trademarks should not be rejected as lacking distinctiveness just because similar signs have been used decoratively on unrelated products in the past.

What a reassurance this is for right holders in 2D and 3D figurative trademarks (and a real treat for those, like me, with an artistic flair for decorations)!

Images

Amit Lahav via Unsplash
Freepik 

Federica Forchino

Author

Federica Forchino

Lead Associate

Contact me

Empower your trademark: Connect with our legal experts

Are you interested in protecting your trademark? Contact our lawyers and experts today and start your journey towards a strong trademark!

Related read

Silvia Asiolis Pressrelese Abion Milan office

Abion Expands Italian Presence with Milan Office Opening and Key Appointment of Silvia Asioli

Announcements
English
pll_66979ce36d166
23, July 2024
We are excited to announce the acquisition of Lane IP, a renowned UK-based IP specialist. This strategic acquisiti...
Video games: TÜRKPATENT decisions are promising for broader brand protection in Türkiye

Video games: TÜRKPATENT decisions are promising for broader brand protection in Turkey

Trademark Management
English
3, July 2024
Why two recent rejections by the Turkish Patent and Trademark Office could be good news for video games publishers...

This website uses cookies

Cookies ("cookies") consist of small text files. The text files contain data which is stored on your device. To be able to place some type of cookies we need your consent. We at Abion AB, corporate identity number 556633-6169 use these types of cookies. To read more about which cookies we use and storage duration, click here to get to our cookiepolicy.

Manage your cookie-settings

Necessary cookies

Necessary cookies are cookies that need to be placed for fundamental functions on the website to work. Fundamental functions are for instance cookies that are needed for you to use menus and navigate the website.

Functional cookies

Functional cookies need to be placed for the website to perform in the way that you expect. For instance to remember which language you prefer, to know if you are logged in, to keep the website secure, remember login credentials or to enable sorting of products on the website in the way that you prefer.

Statistical cookies

To know how you interact with the website we place cookies to collect statistics. These cookies anonymize personal data.

Ad measurement cookies

To be able to provide a better service and experience we place cookies to tailor marketing for you. Another purpose for this placement is to market products or services to you, give tailored offers or market and give recommendations on new concepts based on what you have bought from us previously.

Ad measurement user cookies

In order to show relevant ads we place cookies to tailor ads for you

Personalized ads cookies

To show relevant and personal ads we place cookies to provide unique offers that are tailored to your user data